|
![]() by Paul Fischer |
||
| Home Review Archives Posters Interview Archives History of Cranky | |||
|
Shrek is unlike any animated film you have
ever seen. A cartoon for adults, it's a fractured fairy "When we started Shrek, we wanted to make a fairy tale come to
life," says New Zealander Andrew Adamson, who directed the film with
Vicky Jenson, "as if you opened a storybook and stepped into that
world." And what a world it is. Fairy tale creatures come alive, but not
as you expect, in this often hilarious tale of the green ogre who, like Garbo,
wants to be left alone., but gets caught up with a fast-talking donkey , a brash
Shrek, loosely based on a novel of the same name by William Steig, is set in a far mythical swamp, home of that bad tempered ogre named Shrek, whose once precious solitude is suddenly shattered by an invasion of annoying fairy tale characters. There are blind mice in his food, a big, bad wolf in his bed, three little homeless pigs and more, all banished from their kingdom by the evil Lord Farquaad (Lithgow). Determined to save their home--not to mention his own--Shrek cuts a deal with Farquaad and sets out to rescue the beautiful Princess Fiona (Cameron Diaz) to be Farquaad's bride. Accompanying him on his mission is wisecracking Donkey (Eddie Murphy), who will do anything for Shrek... except shut up of course. Rescuing the Princess from a fire-breathing dragon may prove the least of their problems when the deep, dark secret she has been keeping is revealed. Co-director Adamson, who had been with Shrek for the past five years, was finally able to breathe a sigh of relief now that the film was ready for audience unveiling. "It seems like we were never going to", he says amidst nervous laughter. But Adamson need not worry. The film, which is the first animated movie to screen in competition at Cannes in three decades, is garnering strong reaction. The director agrees. "I'm obviously pleased it's getting a good reaction." But not necessarily surprised "because the animation process goes on for so long, that you reach a certain point where you start knowing that it's going to be OK." He and his team reached that point a year ago, he says. "Ever since then it seems to have gotten better, which is nice."
It's hard to imagine that a comic fairy tale such as Shrek would even
come close to controversy, |
|||
| Adamson acknowledged that some
older viewers are likely to view the film in the context of DreamWorks co-founder
Jeffrey Katzenberg' s famous legal feud with his former employer, Disney. "He
certainly enjoyed the jokes," Adamson said. "Even when we made fun of
Beauty and the Beast, which is one of the Disney movies he was proudest
of being involved with. "But the movie's too good-hearted to be any revenge-based
thing. If people think that, they're really missing the point of it, which is
to turn fairy tales on their ears." Adamson laughed at many observers' suggestion
that the evil Farquaad appears to be modeled on Katzenberg' s old nemesis, Disney
boss Michael Eisner. Katzenberg is bemused by all the fuss. "Have you met
Eisner? They look nothing alike, so it's ridiculous to make that assumption."
On the contrary, Katzenberg reiterates, "If that heritage were not loved
by everybody and respected throughout the world, including by us, then you couldn't
satirize it. You have to start with the fact that you must acknowledge how important,
distinctive and distinguished it is. I know in my heart that we have been playful
with it and I know that we have not been mean-spirited."
The DreamWorks boss is happier to discuss the genuine thrill of having Shrek go to Cannes in competition no less. "It's probably one of the most amazing things that has happened to me in thirty years in the movie business", says the man who steered such Disney hits as Beauty and the Beast and The Lion King to box office glory. "To be invited to the single-most prestigious and important international film festival in competition for an animated movie, is just extraordinary." Katzenberg, who became involved with animation more by accident than design, remains genuinely surprised "and amazed at how far we've come." Shrek, which is visually the most remarkable example of the genre thus far, epitomizes the advances of technology and the increased role of the computer to create lifelike characters. "Part of what's exciting about all of this, is that it's made me reinvent myself, because I started in a twentieth century enterprise, with its roots clearly in the thirties and forties. It's now a world that has clearly moved into the 21st century and everything about it is very different." That difference, he says, is defined by a movie such as Shrek "which uses the computer in a way that we only dreamed of five years ago." Award-winning actor John Lithgow, who so beautifully voices the comically
villainous Farquaad, took his children on a
Shrek is a film that caters for everyone, not just for children. "I've seen the movie play with both audiences, and we get very different, but positive, reactions", says Katzenberg. But the DreamWorks boss also points out that as impressive as computers are, it doesn't mean the end of traditional animation either. "There's a place for all of it. Our next film, Spirit, is very traditional, and we're working with Aardman on The Tortoise and the Hare, different again." It's all about breaking the rules and changing with the times. Shrek is destined to do it all. | |||